CRE Finance Council is a trade association that is...

  • Dedicated exclusively to the nearly $6 trillion commercial real estate finance industry
  • Committed to promoting strong & liquid debt markets across platforms
  • The meeting place for industry professionals
  • The platform for establishing best practices, industry standards & federal policy
  • Comprised of approximately 400 companies and 19,000 individual members

CREFC News

News Archive

News

Reporting Guidance for CMBS Trust Holdbacks

December 26, 2024

Overview of Trust Termination Process and Need for Holdbacks

CMBS securitizations have been around for 30 years. The governing securitization servicing document, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (collectively referred to as the PSA for CMBS conduit transactions, Trust and Servicing Agreement for SASB transactions, and Servicing Agreement for CRE CLO transactions), expressly includes mechanics for the winding down of a trust, but it does not specifically address how the transaction parties are protected from, and reimbursed for, ongoing or anticipated costs and expenses following such wind-down.

The transaction parties in a securitization are hired by the trust on behalf of the certificate holders and have the contractual right to be indemnified by the trust for certain costs, expenses, and liabilities related to each deal party’s actions on behalf of the trust. As a practical matter, the value of the indemnification to the transaction parties is limited to the assets and resources available to the securitization trust. As pool assets dwindle, the value of the indemnification protection afforded to the transaction parties erodes and participants become more exposed to loss.

The use of Holdback Amounts can arise at the disposition of one particular asset or through the final loan liquidation of the trust that may at the time contain more than one asset.

The trust typically unwinds in one of two ways:

  1. A natural pay down of the loan(s); or
  2. election by one of the designated parties to acquire the remaining loans (also called a “clean-up call” or “pool collapse”).

In a natural pay-down of a trust, all of the loans are paid off and the investors receive the distribution of funds via the full payoff of loans and/or through the proceeds returned from the resolution of defaulted loans. In a clean-up call or pool collapse, one of the designated parties to the PSA elects to terminate the trust by purchasing the remaining assets from the trust in accordance with the terms of the PSA.

Whether unwound via natural pay down or a clean-up call, once unwound, the trust will no longer have any assets but is likely to have trailing or contingent liabilities (including, but not limited to, final legal bills, vendor invoices, and ongoing or potential litigation costs). Such amounts are costs and expenses of the trust for which the transaction parties are not liable. It is established servicing standard practice to have transaction parties determine the appropriate Holdback Amounts and report accordingly to investors. 

CREFC IRP - Reporting Holdback Amounts to Investors

The current CREFC® IRP includes data fields to facilitate the reporting of Holdback Amounts to investors when it is tied to a specific loan liquidation. Specifically:

(1) [L116] (Amounts Held Back for Future Payment)

This scenario is typically seen when there are trailing expenses or potential litigation expenses tied directly to the asset being liquidated. The responsible transaction party (master servicer or trustee, as applicable) will report any Holdback Amount under this scenario per the CREFC® IRP for the reporting cycle during which the Holdback Amount was established. Reporting guidelines dictate that the loan level information is not reported in subsequent reporting cycles. As such, the remaining balance should be addressed in the annual deal-level reserve reporting.

At the unwinding of the trust, the transaction parties will incur certain expenses to effectuate the closing of the trust and associated accounts. Typically, these expenses are not significant and are resolved within the 12 months following liquidation of the final asset in the trust. Any remaining funds from the holdback are remitted to the Certificate Administrator for further remittance to certificateholders. There is no currently required additional reporting for these transaction-level Holdback Amounts other than the normal remittance process with the Certificate Administrator.

Due to the sensitive nature of disclosing the amount of estimated litigation exposure or potential settlement amounts, such information would likely constitute privileged information pursuant to the PSA, which generally is not shared with certificate holders or other transaction parties because the disclosure of that information could significantly compromise the trust’s position in litigation and related settlement discussions and also could increase overall trust losses. Inappropriate disclosure has the potential to undermine litigation defenses to the detriment of transaction parties, as well as certificate holders.


Considerations for Holdback Amounts Post-Wind-Down

Once a trust is wound down, there typically has been no additional reporting to investors required under the governing transaction documents. Alternatively, if a trust is wound down but there are material Holdback Amounts, market participants are asking that the transaction party holding such Holdback Amounts provide a deal notice identifying the Holdback Amount to the Certificate Administrator to be posted on the Certificate Administrator’s website and that any additional or outstanding Holdback Amounts after the trust has wound down should be updated, provided to the Certificate Administrator, and posted on the Certificate Administrator’s website on an annual basis until such Holdback Amounts are fully liquidated or disbursed. Such additional reporting would provide transaction parties and investors with heightened transparency regarding material Holdback Amounts, notwithstanding the fact that the trust no longer holds mortgage loan assets or REO property. The CREFC® IRP committee is working on future reporting templates. In the interim it is suggested that the Master Servicer annually provides notice to shareholders of holdbacks in excess of $1,000,000.

Please contact Rohit Narayanan (RNarayanan@crefc.org) with any questions.

 

Contact 

Rohit Narayanan
Managing Director, Industry Initiatives
646.884.7569

The information provided herein is general in nature and for educational purposes only. CRE Finance Council makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, validity, usefulness, or suitability of the information provided. The information should not be relied upon or interpreted as legal, financial, tax, accounting, investment, commercial or other advice, and CRE Finance Council disclaims all liability for any such reliance. © 2024 CRE Finance Council. All rights reserved.
Reporting Guidance for CMBS Trust Holdbacks
December 26, 2024
Read for reporting guidance for CMBS Trust Holdbacks.

News

CREFC's NOVEMBER 2024 Monthly CMBS Loan Performance Report

December 23, 2024

CRE Finance Council has released a report on CMBS loan performance for November.*

Key takeaways:

DELINQUENCY RATE SURGES ABOVE 6%


  • Conduit/SASB CMBS combined delinquency of 6.40%
    • Delinquency rate has increased in nine of the last 11 months
    • On a YOY basis, the overall combined delinquency rate is up 182 bps (6.40% vs. 4.58% in November 2023)
  • Office delinquency rate surged 101 bps in November to 10.38%, following a similar increase in October
    • Office loans accounted for more than 60% of the net increase in the overall dollar amount of delinquent loans in November
    • Office delinquency rate is up 430 bps YOY
    • Convergence of WFH demand shock, elevated rates (despite year-to-date Fed rate cuts), and a pullback in bank lending will continue to present office financing headwinds
  • November delinquency rate is still 392 bps below the 10.32% peak in June 2020 – the height of pandemic-related lockdowns
  • Loans in special servicing (SS) rose 39 bps to 9.53% in November, second-largest uptick of 2024 after April’s 80 bp increase
    • SS rate is at highest level since April 2021 and has increased every month of 2024; now 275 bps higher than the 6.78% mark at year-end 2023
  • In a report dated 12/6/24, BofA Global Research examined YTD pay-off trends for conduit loans
    • In one analysis, pay-off rates were calculated by property type and loan size; successful pay-off rates decreased as loan size increased, with office loans facing the most significant challenges
    • Among IO loans, only 56% of loans paid off, below the 62% across the overall sample; among amortizing loans, a much higher 81% paid off on time


*Source: Trepp. CMBS data in this report reflect a total outstanding balance of $629B: 56.4% ($354.9B) conduit CMBS, 43.6% ($274.1B) single-asset/single-borrower (SASB) CMBS.

Click here to download the full report. Contact Raj Aidasani for more information on CMBS loan performance.

Contact 

Raj Aidasani
Managing Director, Research
646.884.7566

The information provided herein is general in nature and for educational purposes only. CRE Finance Council makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, validity, usefulness, or suitability of the information provided. The information should not be relied upon or interpreted as legal, financial, tax, accounting, investment, commercial or other advice, and CRE Finance Council disclaims all liability for any such reliance. © 2024 CRE Finance Council. All rights reserved.
CREFC's NOVEMBER 2024 Monthly CMBS Loan Performance Report
December 23, 2024
CRE Finance Council has released a report on CMBS loan performance for November.

News

Rep. French Hill to Lead House Financial Services Committee

December 17, 2024

Congressman French Hill (R-AR) won a four-way race to become chairman of the House Financial Services Committee (HFSC) in the next Congress. Hill will replace retiring Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-NC) who served as the lead HFSC Republican since 2019 and as chairman for the past two years.

Why it matters: Rep. Hill brings a deep knowledge of financial markets as he takes the committee gavel. He was a founder and CEO of Delta Trust and Banking Corp., and he was Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Corporate Finance from 1989 to 1991.

  • Hill was first elected to Congress in 2014 and has served on HFSC in a variety of leadership capacities, including as the current committee vice chair and chair of the Digital Assets Subcommittee.
  • CREFC has a strong relationship with Rep. Hill, who has been a key ally on issues like Basel Capital rules, Conflicts of Interest in Securitization, and 15c2-11.
  • In his pitch for the chairmanship, Hill laid out his “Make Community Banking Great Again” plan, which includes a number of proposals to tailor and reduce regulatory burdens on financial institutions.

Go deeper: The House GOP selects its committee leaders via the Steering Committee, which includes the chamber leadership (Speaker, majority leader, etc.) and other rank-and-file members selected from various regions.

The race to succeed McHenry was among the most closely contested in this cycle as Hill faced off against other senior committee members:

  • Rep. Andy Barr (R-KY) was first elected in 2012 and currently serves as HFSC Financial Institutions Subcommittee Chair;
  • Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-MI) was first elected in 2010 and currently serves as HFSC Oversight Subcommittee Chair; and
  • Rep. Frank Lucas (R-OK) was first elected in 1994 and currently serves as Chairman of the House Space, Science, and Technology Committee. Lucas also had been the lead Republican on the House Agriculture Committee.

What they’re saying: Toward the end of the campaign, insiders saw the race tighten between Hill and Barr, with some expecting Barr to take the gavel given Hill’s close ties to ousted Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA). Barr is also seen as a favorite to succeed Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) should he choose not to run for re-election in 2026.

The bottom line: The HFSC contest was not acrimonious and observers noted that Republicans had strong options in all the candidates. Former HFSC chair Rep. Jeb Hensarling told Politico:

“It was going to be a good day for America and her capital regardless of who was chosen. French Hill will be a fantastic chair. Absolutely fantastic.”

Contact David McCarthy (dmccarthy@crefc.org) with questions. 
 

Contact  

David McCarthy
Managing Director, Chief Lobbyist, 
Head of Legislative Affairs
202.448.0855
dmccarthy@crefc.org
Rep. French Hill will lead the HFSC next congress.

Rep. French Hill will lead the House Financial Services Committee starting in January 2025.

The information provided herein is general in nature and for educational purposes only. CRE Finance Council makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, validity, usefulness, or suitability of the information provided. The information should not be relied upon or interpreted as legal, financial, tax, accounting, investment, commercial or other advice, and CRE Finance Council disclaims all liability for any such reliance. © 2024 CRE Finance Council. All rights reserved.
Rep. French Hill to Lead House Financial Services Committee
December 17, 2024
Congressman French Hill (R-AR) won a four-way race to become chairman of the House Financial Services Committee (HFSC) in the next Congress.

We are lenders, investors & servicers.​

Become a Member

CREFC offers industry participants an unparalleled ability to connect, participate, advocate and learn!
Join Now

Sign Up for eNews